Critical Readability

My critical readings of the best and worst of online media

Why Paul Ryan is not ‘bad’ for women – CNN.com

There is a lot going on in this op-ed, and I’m not going to comment on all of it. You can read for yourself why the author, Anita McBride, thinks Ryan is “not bad for women.” I mostly want to emphasize one point – the GOP and conservative media keep saying that this election is not about “social issues” it’s about the economy. They say it’s not about women, or abortion, or homosexuality and same-sex marriage. It’s not about race, or minorities, or immigration.

In reality, of course, this election is about both the economy and social issues. Why do we try to sub-divide and put everything in little boxes? These things are linked, they do not exist in a vacuum. I know it’s difficult to see shades of gray and to think critically and with nuance (especially when states like Texas and Missouri are trying to give students the right to opt out of learning critical thinking skills or subjects that challenge their beliefs). Come on people, study your history. In times of economic strife, women and minorities are always, always the first to suffer. Read Anita McBride’s article here: Why Paul Ryan is not ‘bad’ for women – CNN.com.

Advertisements

Single Post Navigation

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: